essential to who? more than half the set is essential but redone 6 times before the other 40% is new non essential songs.
All the hits that you need I know that there are a lot of "Greatest Hits" or "Best of" from any group and there'll always be some songs that slip through the cracks. If you do not have anything from I ron Maiden, this is a great place to start. Brings back memories...
More like The ASSential Iron Maiden OK, let's get one thing straight right off the bat: NOTHING Iron Maiden have recorded since '7th Son of the 7th Son' deserves to be called 'essential' in any way, shape or form so the title of this comp (which is pretty pointless to begin with given how many of these things already exist....) is highly misleading.
The worst offenders here are the 4 Blaze era cuts (Futureal, The Clansman, Sign of the Cross, Man on the Edge) which are beyond dreadful in every way possible. Nails on a chalkboard! I guess, we'll never know what kind of glue Steve Harris was sniffing when he picked this atonal wannabe over the scores of great vocalists that also applied for the then vacant job. And 'Arry's songwriting was just as bad as his singer during those dark years.
Aside from the Blaze stinkers there's plenty of weak Bruce-era stuff on tap as well. 'Dance of Death' must be referring to the band preparing for their own funeral, one of the weakest Maiden albums ever. 'Brave New World' was actually a decent if spotty comeback album; the Adrian Smith-penned 'The Wickerman' is a good rocker that harkens back to the days when Maiden got to the point in 3 or 4 minutes instead of putting people in a coma with pseudo progressive drivel. On the other band, 'Be Quick Or Be Dead', 'Fear of the Dark', and 'Holy Smoke' are all subpar and lifeless (where is 'Tailgunner'?), and Nicko's stiff drumming totally kills 'Bring Your Daughter.... To the Slaughter' (shades of Samson!) which Bruce recorded a far superior version of on his own (and landed a hit with - which is why Harris wanted to it on this album. But that's another story.....). Closer 'The Clairvoyant' isn't exactly a barnburner either.
Bottom line: Disc 1 is certified GARBAGE almost without exception.
So we've had gone through the bad and the ugly - what is the good? - All the very early stuff, of course. Steve Harris has stated that he doesn't like the first Maiden sonically but the sense of urgency the lads played with back then has never been matched. I'm burned out on 'Running Free' but it's still a great song, and 'Phantom of the Opera' is a masterpiece. Sadly, the band's best album, 'Killers' gets short shrift here (I'd have added at least 2 more tracks, especially the epic 'Prodigal Son') and the Bruce tracks take up most of the space on Disc 2. And they're all top shelf Maiden with the exception of 'Heaven Can Wait' (gimme 'Where Eagles Dare' or 'Can I Play with Matches' instead). God, Maiden really were amazing band once upon a time but they crashed hard and ran out of good ideas about 20 years ago as Disc 1 is ample proof of.
Bottom line #2: This should be a single not a double CD as Disc 1 is clearly anything but essential. I wouldn't even recommend this comp to a Maiden newbie - just get the first 4 albums instead and be AMAZED at the true brilliance that WAS Iron Maiden (and then get the next 3 studio album and 'Life After Death' - that's all you'll ever need).
I'm giving this release 2 stars - 5 stars for Disc 2 and minus 3 stars for Disc 1 and the fact that this is simply another poor catch-in attempt by the band's label to bilk die-hard fans and collectors.
Iron Maiden This product turned out to be exactly like the description and it got to me in a decent amount of time.
Thanks
"The Essential Iron Maiden"? "Finally a Maiden Compilation that doesn't suck"??? I think NOT!!!! For starters, I am Canadian, and I am a HUGE Maiden fan. Maiden ARE my life. Maiden are almost all I listen to (don't worry, I listen to other stuff too), and their music have pretty much made me the person I am. With only 3 weak albums (No Prayer, The X Factor, Virtual XI), and the other albums being great, Maiden have changed my life and made me a better person...musically. My dad has offered to take me to Somewhere Back In Time 2008 when it comes here.
Now this is obviously just a cash in from Essential. If it's the "Essential" Maiden, then why is 98% of this just singles? The only REAL essential tracks on here are The Clansman (I've grown to like the song), Sign Of The Cross and Phantom Of The Opera. I believe that any compilation without "Genghis Khan" and "Murders In The Rue Morgue", as well as "Invaders" is NOT a Maiden Compilation that "doesn't suck".
Here would be my tracklisting (spanning from Iron Maiden to Dance of Death, like this does):
(spanning over 2 or 3 discs)
1. Phantom of the Opera 2. Prowler 3. Iron Maiden 4. The Ides Of March and Wrathchild 5. Murders In The Rue Morgue 6. Genghis Khan 7. Purgatory 8. Run to the Hills 9. Invaders 10. The Number Of The Beast 11. Children Of The Damned 12. Where Eagles Dare 13. Revelations 14. Flight Of Icarus 15. The Trooper 16. Aces High 17. 23:58 18. Powerslave 19. RIME OF THE ANCIENT MARINER (that is essential) 20. Caught Somewhere In Time 21. Wasted Years 22. Sea Of Madness 23. The Lonliness Of The Long Distance Runner 24. Moonchild 25. Seventh Son Of A Seventh Son 26. Be Quick Or Be Dead 27. Afraid To Shoot Strangers 28. Childhood's End 29. Sign Of The Cross 30. The Clansman 31. Brave New World 32. Ghost Of The Navigator 33. Wildest Dreams 34. No More Lies 35. New Frontier
Overall, that's my compilation. I think that'd be a better compilation. Ok whatever, I think I'll go to Edward The (Not so) Great CD, you know, where they include the most overhyped tracks like this does. Except this is much worse.
UP THE IRONS, and AVOID THIS CRAPPY CASH IN FROM ESSENTIAL!