Trying to comprehend quantum field theory but don't have infinite time or the IQ of Einstein? No problem! This easy-to-follow guide helps you understand this complex subject matter without spending a lot of energy.
Quantum Field Theory Demystified covers essential principles such as particle physics and special relativity. You'll learn about Lagrangian field theory, group theory, and electroweak theory. The book also explains continuous and discretesymmetries, spontaneous symmetry breaking, and supersymmetry. With thorough coverage of the mathematics of quantum field theory and featuring end-of-chapter quizzes and a final exam to test your knowledge, this book will teach you the fundamentals of this theoretical framework in no time at all.
This fast and easy guide offers:
Numerous figures to illustrate key concepts
Sample equations with worked solutions
Coverage of quantum numbers
Details on the Dirac equation, the Feynman rules, and the Higgs mechanism
A time-saving approach to performing better on an exam or at work
Simple enough for a beginner, but challenging enough for an advanced student, Quantum Field Theory Demystified is your shortcut to understanding this fascinating area of physics.
Kindle Warning: Many equations unreadable This book has been reviewed for content by several others. In that regard I agree with those who say that despite its warts (various typos and lapses in explanation) it is a good investment and valuable for those seeking to make sense of the usual scattered and disconnected treatments of QFT at the introductory level.
But I mean this review to be primarily about the Kindle version as the content has been reviewed by others. I strongly suggest you do not buy the Kindle version. The conversion from the book to the Kindle format was obviously made without ever looking at the result! It shows complete lack of editorial control (or self-respect) that this book would be offered for the Kindle.
As might be expected of a book on QFT, this book is filled with equations. Those equations that appeared "set off" from the text, that is between sections of text, were apparently converted to images and hence can be read, albeit in many cases the resulting symbols are incredibly small and cannot be enlarged by the Kindle. However, the approximately 25% of the equations that are "in-line" with the text cannot be read at all - any greek letters, mathematical symbols, etc. appear as boxed question marks. If you know your QM and QFT pretty well, you can read around and imagine what should be there, but its not pleasant and woe to the beginner.
Unfortunately this experience will make me leery of purchasing any Kindle book on a mathematical topic.
Somewhat of a disappointment... This is not the first book from which I try to completely understand QFT. A awaited the coming out of this book with a huge anticipation, because I already owned two other books written by the same author - about the non-relativistic quantum mechanics and about the general relativity, and I consider them great. Unfortunately, this book doesn't quite fit the bill. The reasons:
1. The connection between the Lagrangians and the Feynman rules is unclear (for instance, there is nothing mentioned about the Wick's theorem).
2. There is essentially nothing about the divergences and renormalization.
The reasons, why I don't criticize this book more harshly, are:
1. There seems to be no really good "introduction" level book about QFT (the closest ones are Lahiri, "A First Book of QFT", Harris, "A Pedestrian Approach to QFT (out of print, used books expensive!), Greiner, "Field Quantization" and Hatfield, "QFT of Point Particles and Strings". But don't even approach any of these, if you hadn't mastered the Griffiths book about the elementary particles and the full-blown non-relativistic QM in Dirac's bra-ket notation !).
2. Lots of derivations present in this book are either completely omitted or "left for the reader" in other QFT books.
In other words, considering that QFT is the most difficult of the "ortodox", i.e. well established, physical theories, don't expect any "silver bullet" here. There is no such a bullet!
Wish it had come out a long time ago When I was first trying to learn Quantum Field Theory (QFT), at the end of my college years and at the beginning of the graduate schools, the jump from the "regular" quantum mechanics seemed almost insurmountable. Even with a full year of graduate quantum mechanics, the kinds of concepts and calculations that are the staple of the QFT seemed beyond anything that I had encountered in Physics before. Unfortunately to this day there aren't many QFT textbooks that will give you the benefit of the doubt when first learning the subject. Most of them aim to be comprehensive, rather than pedagogical. Which is unfortunate because many more basic concepts and results are not beyond the ability of a more motivated undergraduate to grasp. In the light of that, I wish that David McMahon's book had been published earlier. There clearly is a need for book of this type, for both those who are interested in preparing themselves for a full-fledged course on QFT, as well for many practicing Physicist who could benefit from knowing the bare essentials of QFT for their own line of research (particle physicists, astrophysicists, etc.). As correctly pointed out by other reviewers, the book has its flaws. The ones that I find particularly prominent are 1. Many mistakes, 2. It can be conceptually fuzzy and less than accurate when it comes to some key concepts. 3. Non-inclusion of non-relativistic QFT (important for condensed matter applications) 4. Inclusion of Supersymmetry, which is a non-standard topic for most textbooks, and not even a verified concept, and 5. Poor typesetting. However, even with those flaws, the book is an important text for everyone who is interested in learning about QFT on their own for the first time. But it is not meant for everyone: one year of college-level quantum mechanics and familiarity with the modern tensor notation would be the minimal requirement s for taking a fool advantage of this book.
Not all that bad, really! I have not finished reading this book because the Kindle version makes the equations an unreadable mess! Don't buy the Kindle book unless they can get their scanners working on symbols, operators, etc. What good is it otherwise. I got my money back. As far as the content is concerned it is just right for a self-learner who wants to crack this nut. It is the appetizer before the main meal. One should not be over critical when any attempt to make this subject understandable should be applauded. I'll stick to the print version for now.
at least it's a start I ordered this book after I went through the first seven chapters of David Griffiths' "Introduction to Elementary Particles" and decided I wanted something that concentrated a little more on the theoretical side. Of course I didn't expect this book to be more than a peek into the mysteries of QFT, and the author is careful in the Preface to outline its limitations ("By design, this book is not thorough or complete....after completing this book, you will find that studying other quantum field theory books will be easier.") I hope he's right! I'm going to try tackling Zee next.
Anyway, I think the book is OK given the obvious challenges of trying to present QFT in an understandable way to a novice. I certainly didn't get everything, but I did manage to understand most of the material and get most of the problems in the Quizzes. But I wonder if I would have found it intelligible if I had not already read Griffiths as well as Schutz's "A First Course in General Relativity", which gave me some familiarity with special relativity, the metric, the Einstein summation convention, the covariant derivative, etc. This would seem to be considerably more than than a background in "basic special relativity" which the author lists in the Preface as one of the prerequisites for understanding his book. In some sections it was only by cross-referencing Griffiths that I was able to be sure I understood the material, and to correct errors in the text.
There are unfortunately plenty of errors, not as many as in "Quantum Mechanics Demystified" but still enough to give the strong impression that the author is either not putting much effort into proofreading, or delegating the task to less-than-fully-qualified individuals. McGraw-Hill should really do its readers/customers a favor and set up an erratum website. The author refers to one in his own website but it is not set up. The majority of the errors are minor arithmetical ones, but even these can often cause considerable confusion while the reader struggles to be sure it's not himself who is in the wrong. (Or are they a deliberate, diabolical strategy to force the reader to actually go through all the calculations?) But some are substantive and seriously interfere with comprehension. There's also an annoying tendency to be sloppy with the notation (or is the author trying to get the reader used to "sloppy physicist's notation"?) and to misplace superscripts and subscripts.
For learning the Feynman rules, Griffiths Chapter 7 is much clearer. But after cracking my skull fruitlessly for hours on Griffiths problem 7.24, I was delighted to find it worked (albeit erroneously, see below) on pages 179-83, so I was able to find where I had gone wrong (just one wrong minus sign in the momenta, durn it!) The exposition of spontaneous symmetry breaking, the Higgs mechanism, and electroweak theory are nice for a beginner (now I'll do Griffiths Chapter 10 and 11).
The following are a list of the most significant errors I've found that I'm relatively certain of (whenever possible by cross-referencing with Griffiths).
pages 16-17: charges of strange and charmed quark switched
page 32-34: in example 2.3, what happened to finding the Hamiltonian?
page 37: the equation representing conservation of energy at the bottom of the page is wrong: it should read d(mu)T(superscript mu)(subscript 0) equals 0.
page 43: equation just before section on Gauge Transformations should have "J(superscript nu)", not "J(superscript mu)".
page 87: second equation is described as "using the notation of Chap. 1" when in fact the notation for unit vector "e carat" was not introduced in Chap. 1 and makes its first unexplained appearance here.
page 103: first equation (p-m)(p+m) should read (pslash-m)(pslash+m) and third equation (p-m)u(p)=(p-m)(p+m)u(0) p should also be pslash.
page 104 helicity operator is sigma vector dot p carat, not sigma vector dot p vector (I think).
page 118 statement the "we..demote position and momentum from their lofty status as operators" would appear to contradict statement on bottom of page 4 that "momentum continues to play a role as an operator".
page 150: Figure 7.7 has errors in labelling of incoming and outgoing particle lines.
page 157: first 4 equations should have delta(q-p3-p4), not delta(q-p3+p4).
page 159: last equation should omit (2pi)^4 delta(p1-p2-p3-p4) term.
page 161: Figure 7.17 is for Question 2, not Question 1.
page 169:last 3 equations denominator should be sqrt(2p0)(2pi)^3/2 (see page 135).
page 177: in third and following equations, the second gamma matrix should be gamma(superscript nu), not gamma(superscript mu). Also, there should be another delta function term for the other vertex: (2pi)^4 delta(q+p2-p4), and an integration factor d4q/(2pi)^4. In general, Chapter 8 would greatly benefit from a clear, simple listing of the Feynman rules as Griffiths does in Chapter 7 section 5 of his book.
page 179: according to Griffiths, sqrt(E+m) IS the normalization factor.
page 183: second set of equations is for the RIGHT term of Equation 8.19, and should end up equalling 2p(i-1), not 2p(1-i), because g11=g22=-1. This gives M=-2g(subscript e)^2 which is the correct answer according to Griffiths (page 253 problem 7.24). But regardless, this is not the correct approach to solving the equation. It does not use the Einstein summation convention for the gamma matrices. See next note.
page 185: this equation for absolute value of M squared is wrong and would have rendered the whole section incomprehensible if I didn't have Griffiths to refer to. The equation should read g(subscript e)^4/4q^4[Tr(pslash3+m)(gamma(superscript mu))(pslash1+m)(gamma(superscript nu))]x[Tr(pslash4+m)(gamma (subscript mu))(pslash2+m)(gamma(subscript nu))].
page 202: first equation leaves out term -1/4(phi1^4+phi2^4) on left side and -3/2m2chi2 on right side, which would make correct final form -m^2chi^2. Then we get "a field chi with mass m and a field PSI (not chi) that is massless".
page 212: first equation: delete "1/2". Second equation is gamma (subscript 5)^2, not ^5.
page 216: first equation, unclear where last term (i Lbar gamma (superscript mu) d(subscript mu)L" comes from. Also first term should be preceded with i.
page 217: second sentence missing a word: "preserve _____ of the action..."
page 220: according to calculations on page 212, term 10.30 should equal zero!
page 226: first line: where does the term (Dsubscriptmu phi)dagger (Dsubscriptmu phi) come from? In any event this should be (Dsubscript mu phi)dagger (Dsuperscriptmu phi).
page 237: integrand in second equation should be exp[-ax^2/2+bx].
Other suggestions to improve comprehension:
page 78: a statement that A(superscript mu) is the wavefunction of the photon would be useful here rather than waiting until page 166.
page 86: statement made that "In Chap. 4 we saw that this was due to ... " Show me where this is discussed in Chap. 4!
page 141: discussion of the interaction picture is garbled. Which picture is in the middle? And why?
page 151: it should be made explicitly clear that signs of momentum are opposite signs of direction for external antiparticle lines.
page 154: some explication of equation 7.18 would be nice: I found it in Griffiths.
page 155: some note that k is equivalent to q would be demystifying.
page 174: are we supposed to just accept equations 2 and 3 as given, or be able to derive them ourselves?
page 202: would help to put the term "vector bosons" in the Index and/or reference definition on page 76.
Too bad the answers to the quiz and final exam questions aren't worked out for the reader's benefit.
Anything Goes Trivia
Megaton Man
Trevor
