Starring: Demi Moore, Gary Oldman, Robert Duvall, Lisa Joliffe-Andoh, Edward Hardwicke Directed By: Roland Joffé Average Rating: Aspect Ratio: 1.33:1 Audience Rating: R (Restricted) Binding: DVD Format: Closed-captioned, Color, DVD-Video, NTSC Label: Buena Vista Home Entertainment Number of Items: 1 Region Code: 1 Release Date: June 04, 2002 Running Time: 135 minutes Theatrical Release Date: October 13, 1995
Description: Sexy Demi Moore (DISCLOSURE, INDECENT PROPOSAL) heats up this powerfully sensual story of illicit love! In a time when adultery is punishable by death, Hester Prynne (Moore) becomes involved in a risky and scandalous affair with her town's handsome minister (Gary Oldman -- MURDER IN THE FIRST). But when their secret passion results in a child, Hester is confronted with the town's overwhelming scorn ... and is condemned to forever wear the scarlet letter "A" as a public brand of shame! A highly provocative retelling of the classic tale of forbidden love, THE SCARLET LETTER combines a sizzling story with exciting stars and delivers must-see entertainment.
Amazon.com: In yet another example of Demi Moore's astonishing narcissism, this appalling adaptation of Nathaniel Hawthorne's Great American Novel becomes a teary, talk-show-worthy story of a woman rediscovering the erotic, of interrupted love, of a brave-but-beleaguered heroine's personal struggle against male stupidity. Never mind that this has little to do with Hawthorne's magnificent, protofeminist book, which is a million times more relevant today than this film could ever be. Director Roland Joffé (The Killing Fields) deserves to be horsewhipped for colluding with Moore's self-fascination, while Gary Oldman should be kicked in the pants for allowing the novel's main character to come off as an inconsequential ninny. Making matters worse, Robert Duvall can be seen ridiculously dancing with a deerskin on his head. If this film were a joke, it would be a very bad joke. But it's not, and that's worse. --Tom Keogh
TRUE LOVE ALWAYS WINS A LOVE STORY THAT MAKES YOU FEEL ALIVE AND FULL OF DESIRE TO LIVE AND LOVE
The Scarlet Letter I went to see The Scarlet Letter twice in one week!!! Just loved Gary Oldman in this role. You will fall in love with him too. Brilliant and savage tale. Not to be missed.
Picky picky I don't understand why so many people are being so picky about this movie deviating from the book. I'm in the middle of reading the book right now. There is maybe a total of 10 minutes worth of action written into it and I'm not surprised that creative license needed to be taken for the screenplay. I love the story line and the way the actors portrayed the deep and painful struggle between their hearts and the status quo of the times. Gary Oldman is overwhelming in his role. I can't tear my eyes off the screen. I'm not as crazy about Demi, but the movie is very worth watching.
From perplexity to propaganda When I saw the DVD box billing this as "An erotic tale of forbidden love!" I knew that this would be at least entertaining, if not actually good. I was right, but not in the way I thought. Instead of being "so bad it's good," (see: the Star Wars prequels, Troy, and the first Batman movie) this was a stunningly well-done piece of propaganda for contemporary social issues. The viewer presented with free love in the form of a passionate hookup with spiritual undertones, an eerily oppressive religious institution, a group of noble (but of course "worldly") women fighting against said religion and the patriarchy that runs it, indigenous people warring against their white oppressors, lecherous men who will rape those who reject thir sexual advances... you get the picture, I'm sure. This is all done with reasonably convincing acting, unconventional camera work (...you really wouldn't have thought knees were erotic before watching this film), and of course, a heart-wrenching, albeit forgettable, soundtrack. That said, this is a film that aims for the heart and not the brain; if you do not empathize with the characters and their situations all the way, there's really no power in it. The intellectual complexity of the story is thus lost almost completely, seeing as one perspective is forced upon the viewer as "correct." Towards the end, the film degenerates into the typical Hollywood "good guy"/"bad guy" dichotomy and of course, the "good guys" win. Sadly predictable... but still, this is still kind of enjoyable in its own way, mostly as an intellectual exercise in the emotional forms of rhetoric made possible only by the development of motion pictures.
I would feel comfortable giving this three stars, seeing as it does have a redeeming value for the discerning viewer just by being so transparently biased and provoking so many questions. However, my conscience won't let me. You see, this film is supposed to be based on a book by Nathanial Hawthorne, which just so happens to be one of the greatest novels ever written in English. What makes the novel so great in the first place is the way it deals with the manifold complexities, ambiguities, and contradictions inherent in the human experience. How does - and should - marriage relate to love? What is the role of law in society? Are human institutions capable of doing the work of the divine? Hawthorne addresses these sorts of questions in such a way that leaves the reader questioning them; he will not settle for an angry, emotional rant against the hypocrisy of puritanical society and the pain caused by a marriage without mutual affection. That would be far too easy and would not truly address the questions that would motivate such a polemic in the first place. The fact that such a rich and complex intellectual work has not only been turned into an "erotic tale of forbidden love," but an overly zealous and preachy one at that seriously irks me. In the hands of a Kubrick or a Fellini, I could very easily see a film adaptation that maintains the foreboding symbolism and moral ambiguity of the novel. The fact that the filmmakers chose to take another, simpler, route is a sign of their failure to keep to the spirit of the book. I couldn't care less how "freely adapted" the plot was if the spirit was preserved (see Fellini's Satyricon for a fine example of how this can be accomplished). But it wasn't. Two stars... but only because it's at least well-done propaganda. Production values have to come into play somehow...
A Truly, TRULY, Terrible Movie Beginning To End! I hope if O sama is captured by the US he is forced to sit through this movie ten times a day.
Demi More's laughable and yet still painfully boring production of The Scarlet Letter is simply one of the worst motion pictures ever made. It is not merely bad, but remarkably bad. I found it completely absurd, tedious, ludicrous, and felt it was "freely adapted" to the detriment of the depth of the original source. This feminist, new agey re-telling of a classic bears scant resemblance to the Hawthorne tale and is unworthy of sharing the title. Sometimes a free adaptation can improve upon the original novel, as with the 1990's version of The Last of the Mohicans, but in this case the reverse was never truer. I could go on and on with what is wrong with this film but why don't I just say EVERYTHING is wrong with this film. Never have I laughed harder AT, not WITH, a movie in my life.
Anything Goes Trivia
Megaton Man
Trevor
