World Famous Comics: Intelligent Thought: Science versus the Intelligent Design Movement
Intelligent Thought: Science versus the Intelligent Design Movement
From: Vintage Publisher: Vintage Average Rating: Binding: Paperback Label: Vintage Number of Items: 1 Number of Pages: 272 Publication Date: May 09, 2006 Release Date: May 09, 2006
Product Description: Evolutionary science lies at the heart of a modern understanding of the natural world. Darwin’s theory has withstood 150 years of scientific scrutiny, and today it not only explains the origin and design of living things, but highlights the importance of a scientific understanding in our culture and in our lives.
Recently the movement known as “Intelligent Design” has attracted the attention of journalists, educators, and legislators. The scientific community is puzzled and saddened by this trend–not only because it distorts modern biology, but also because it diverts people from the truly fascinating ideas emerging from the real science of evolution. Here, join fifteen of our preeminent thinkers whose clear, accessible, and passionate essays reveal the fact and power of Darwin’s theory, and the beauty of the scientific quest to understand our world.
Nothing new here and quite an axe to grind too, even so... This book is a rehash of what should be common knowledge among anyone with a high school education really. But it is so heavy with anti religious bias and a lack of any scientitfc underpinning that it really does the rational thought community on the orgins of our species and the relevant details of evolution something of a diservice.
I say this becasue it provides ammuniton for the "Inteligent Design" people, and a prime "poster boy" to color all anti-creationists with the brush of hopelessly and angry and vitriolical atheists.
Lets be rational here, evolution is a relaity, there can't be any rational scientifc argument to challenge that. So why cloud the issue with anti-religious rants like this? It only serves to keep the ignorant, well ignorant, by uniting them in their anti-rationalism and fear.
Personaly, I know there is no god like some people imagine, Thta is a being with self-awareness etc . That is just ludacrious denial really and mostly motibvated bya denial of our own mortality and inevitable death.
But but rationalism demands thatwe aknowledge the facts on the ground too, that religion helps a lot of people in hard times and the statistical fact is they live longer than atheiset too.
Why not stop these silly and childish attacks on fundamentlaist Christian creationism religions (Hel we won that 'debate' decades ago anyway) and try to enlighten these people so that they can see the obvious truth that Evolution is intelligent design?
It is just that that intelligience is far beyonnd their human understanding. Well, isn't that one of the most basic aspects of a belive in a 'god being' being, that sucha beings mind is beyond human undertanding?
Why don't we use rationalism instead of rheteric? I think we could bring religious people to a greater awareness and humanity that way. Organized religion is certainly the greteast obstacle to most people's spiritual growth and developemnt sure. But with some compasion and reason and an abscence of attack on what these people hold so sacred, perhaps we could all move forward and reduce the hate of both Christians and people like the author of this book. peytonq1@gmail.com
Terse, Well-Written Rebukes of Intelligent Design from Eminent Scientists and Philosophers In "Intelligent Thought: Science Versus The Intelligent Design Movement" editor and literary agent John Brockman has assembled sixteen insightful, quite well-written, essays from leading scientists and philosophers regarding the so-called "Evolution vs. Intelligent Design creationism" debate. While most essays offer ample refutations of Intelligent Design, others explore other, related issues, ranging from the evolution of human consciousness and whether there is indeed evidence supporting the very idea of a "designed" universe. Noted evolutionary geneticist Jerry Coyne distinguishes between "soft" scientific Intelligent Design, and its harder "religious" version, in the opening essay, "Intelligent Design: The Faith That Dare Not Speak Its Name". Eminent philosopher David Dennett explains why Intelligent Design is a hoax in "The Hoax of Intelligent Design and How It Was Perpetrated", discussing at length, favorite Intelligent Design rhetorical techniques like "insisting" that a scientific controversy exists when one doesn't, simply by criticizing or misinterpreting valid published scientific research (One that is clearly a favorite pastime of Discovery Institute mendacious intellectual pornographer William Dembski.). Paleontologists Tim D. White and Neil H. Shubin weigh in with succinct essays on, respectively, the hominoid fossil record ("Human Evolution: The Evidence") and the evolutionary transition from fish to tetrapods ("The `Great" Transition"). Historian of science Frank J. Sulloway explains "Why Darwin Rejected Intelligent Design". Distinguished physicist Lisa Randall compares and contrasts evolutionary theory with Intelligent Design ("Designing Words"), discussing both the extensive evidence for evolution and the history of evolutionary thought, while also noting why Intelligent Design fails scientifically. These sixteen essays are an excellent overview of the mendacious intellectual pornography known as Intelligent Design; for this very reason alone, they deserve to be read by as wide a readership as possible.
Papers that challenge the reader to think and argue This book contains papers about creationism and the thought process of Intelligent design. Each paper is written by an expert in a differentt filed and sometimes I found myself agreeing outloud and sometimes I found myself in certain disbelief. That is the beuaty of this book. It stirs you to think and challenge.
A Mixed Bag I wish I could review each essay individually as it bears on the sub-title. If it was not for the importance of getting works like this out, I might have been tempted to only give three.
The book is a collection of 16 essays, some of which deal directly with the "Intelligent Design" (ID) movement, some of which discuss the ramifications of neo-Darwinism. And some that go quite far afield.
The first essay, by Coyne, is about the fallicy of calling ID a science. He does a great job of describing what science is, why evolution meets that definition, and why ID does not. Basic and easy to follow, this was one of my favorite in the book because it goes straight to the heart of the "controversy".
Susskind writes well, but the main thrust of his essay is about the science-religion conflict and the politics that exist to prolong it, not about the crisis of trying to teach religion in science class.
The third review, by Dennett, covers why people are turned off by evolutionary theory's complexities and become convinced by ID'd PR that it has a valid point to make. It's a good overview of how a nonexistant "scientific debate" has been misrepresented to the public.
In the fourth essay, Humphrey discusses the evolution of human consciousness. This piece was confusing and a bit too philosophical for my liking. I know it was a reply to the ID idea that consciousness must have been designed in, but when he starts showing that consciousness is an illousion of mental activity, he lost me.
Paleotologist White rambles about various digs in Africa to show humans have changed over time.
Shubin does a great job of showing that the great transition at the start of the Cambrian wasn't so great, it was just successful. He covers the fish to tetrapod shift very well, showing that evolution is testable, but that's as close as he gets to dealing with ID.
In his essay, Dawkins starts off by showing that ID's claim that maybe aliens designed us begs the question of where did they come from. He writes mostly about the difficulty of finding alien life, but returns to ID at the very end, albeit briefly.
Next, Sulloway reviews Darwin's thought process from the creation idea that was the prime paradigm of his time to natural selection. More of a history of Darwin's change of mind and methods, it doesn't really address the ID topic.
Atran starts off well, showing that if there was a designer, he sure did a crappy job in some places. He provides several examples of anatomy that could have been designed much better, but make sense with evolution using what's available. Alas, he then turns off into a discussion of the role of religion that rambles off the stating point.
Pinker shows that morality can "evolve" in a society without the interferance of a mandate from a creator. I thought this whole thing was off the topic of the book.
Physicist Smolin discusses the possible origin of our universe and ways it might happen absent the creator's hand. It was a bit hard to follow, and, again, I'm not sure this essay belonged in this collection.
The next piece, by Kauffman, was about self-organization and assembly being possible without outside help. It was confusing.
According to Lloyd in the next essay, the universe is so big and so many chemical reactions, or information processing, happen that it was inevitable that life would arise, no help needed. Some good ideas, but boring.
Randall wrote a rambling piece about part of the history of the evolutionary debate, finishing with some comments about how science is almost never 100% sure, but it's still science.
Hauser chimes in with a piece about how the government shouldn't force subjects outside of a diciplin to be taught within the subject's curriculum. While a course on scientific controversies would be interesting, it shouldn't be part of an actual high-school science course for fear it would confuse the students as to what was accepted science and what is not. This was a good piece about education and the importance of keeping to the curriculum needed at that level.
And last, Sampson describes why it's important for evolution not only to be understood itself, but also in tandem with ecology.
Overall, the book was a good read, but some of the essays seemed out of place in this work. Still, I liked it. The addition of excerpts from the anti-ID decision in Kitzmiller vs Dover School District at the end was a nice touch.
All over the map This collection of essays is all over the place. The first essay by Jerry Coyne is a gem. It is the most thorough and concise explanation I have seen of the evidence for evolution and of why Intelligent Design is not science. A similar essay by Coyne is available online if you know where to look.
After that, mileage varies considerably. Daniel Dennett does a presentable job of explaining some of the rhetorical hijinx engaged in by ID advocates. Steven Pinker does a nice job presenting evolutionary models for morality. Some of the others seem off-target or even weak. I would like to know where Lisa Randall gets her numbers, and how deep her knowledge of biology is. I didn't get much out of Nicholas Humphrey's essay on consciousness. It is devoid of any sense of the fascinating findings of cognitive science of the last several decades. Seth Llloyd's essay on the computing power of hte universe was so far out there that I have no idea how sound it might be.
The appendix, with an excerpt from Judge Jones' decision in the Kitsmiller v. Dover case, is another gem, and one that is also available elsewhere.
Anything Goes Trivia
Megaton Man
Trevor
